For a project in uni, I collected data from a model that I put in a column. An example of such a column is shown below, where baseline means one run of results. As you can see each grid has an attached coordinate. To present my results I am trying to overlay these results over a map, to visualise it better. To this end what I am trying to do is shown in the table 'coordinate map'. Each coordinate would take a spot in that table, I could get an outline of the map over that table and that would create my desired result. Suggestions of other methods of getting such a result are also welcome but for now I am trying this.
​
Additional info:
As there are only 96 total grids with data, I could put those in manually for one run, but I have to repeat it for 13 runs and that is just a bit too much work where mistakes may creep in. I had a few ideas with no success so far 1) I try and use a SUMIF or IF function to somehow only add the values to the 'coordinate map' cell of 58,7 if the cell grid coordinate has value 58,7. I don't see how to this though as the list is one column and the map is a table. 2) find a way to fill colour cells according to a scale as in conditional formatting, but again, the condition would be based out of the list and in a different format.
I feel like there would be a way to attribute the value of the list to the coordinate map table automatically if the coordinate of the tablecell equals that of the coordinate in the list, but I can't seem to find it. I would be very grateful for any suggestions to do this or another method that I can use to visualise this result.
Kind regards,
Timo
​
The data I obtained from my model, there are 96 grids with values from 0-4.
The coordinate table I am trying to use as a means to show the results from the list in a more visual way.

I'm an occasional C# programmer who generally writes console applications for things like processing excel files (budget, asset tracking ...) and other sort of "quick hitter" utilities.
Recently I developed one such application (call it app1) that utilized the DateTime struct. I was using MSVS 2022 V17.5.4 with .Net 4.8.0.4084 under Windows10. This generated an exe and it worked as as expected.
Then I realized the DateOnly struct would be useful. It requires .NET 6. After some searching the web, I upgraded the project using the Upgrade Assistant Visual Studio extension. The Application>General>Target framework is now set to .Net 6.0.
The App.config file contains the following:

After I did that I was able to use the DateOnly struct and the program worked as expected. When I built the Release and moved the file app1.exe to the working directory I tried to run it.
The console window told me it couldn't find app1.dll. If I include app1.dll in the working directory things work as expected.
Prior to upgrading the project the file app1.exe was suitable for execution without requiring app1.dll.
I'll probably have to better understand how .Net works, which I will follow up on.
But for now, would someone be able to explain why my app1.exe file now requires app1.dll? As I mentioned, this wasn't the case prior to the upgrade.

35 AMAB, married, with two beautiful daughters, and about a year ago I discovered I was at odds with my gender assigned at birth and have been subsequently diagnosed with gender dysphoria after exploring my concerns in depth with my psychologist.
This past year I have explored various methods to alleviate gender dysphoria, including mindfulness training, positive affirmations, and self-acceptance courses. Despite my best efforts, I have come to the realization that these methods, including attempting to “think” my way out of my gender dysphoria, have not been serving me well.
One aspect that has been particularly challenging is the disconnection I have from my body. I struggle to fully connect with it and find respect or liking for it. I don't necessarily despise my body, I would just much prefer to have a female body. (Dysphoria for me is a sadness, a sustained sense of hopelessness reminding me I can't have the body I long for). I do however experience euphoria when I wear dresses, makeup etc. That may seem reasonably inert detail, but the fact dysphoria hasn’t manifested in outright hatred towards my body that you so often hear is the case, really compounds to the confusion around justifying the pursuit of hormone therapy, as you'll soon read.
I have experienced a loss of libido and difficulties with sexual satisfaction since discovering I had gender incongruity issues. I found temporary relief from all dysphoria after climaxing, sometimes lasting hours, and this lead me to convince myself that there were perhaps alternative motivations at play or at least hope of alternative ways to disprove or overcome dysphoria. However, after a lot of internalizing and journaling, it occurred to me that it’s actually more likely that the medical professionals are correct in their diagnosis. And my gender, and feelings towards, is probably completely beyond my control. And importantly, that these moments of relief are fleeting, meaningless, and arguably counterproductive as they result in false narratives, so I'm now learning to challenge the thoughts associated with experiencing sudden relief. That flip has been a big step for me, considering I used to spend my mental energy to challenge the dysphoric and euphoric feelings.
Until recently, I've viewed medical transition as being in direct competition with my values. I've really struggled with the notion that my "selfish wants / desires", are somehow getting the better of me, causing me to constantly think about about transitioning.
But I'm finding that I keep arriving at the same conclusion: I am a woman. I am a woman despite my doubts. I am a woman despite my fears. I can't change it. I can't control it, nor can my ambitions, my past achievements, my family. I simply am. I'm not broken. It's not going to "go away". It's not going to change. I might have reached out to the medical staff first, but I'm the last to the party. I need to learn to accept it. Embrace it. And this realization has provided me with a profound sense of clarity amidst the confusion and doubts, as it seems to provide an elegant answer to all of the seemingly irrational and selfish prospects transitioning has, in a way that suppression and ignoring couldn't ever do.
However this newfound clarity has also made me acutely aware of it’s implications. Though it pains me to say (there are some major potential relationship implications here), I have to face the very real possibility that the only viable way forward to live authentically is through medical transitioning, encompassing hormone therapy and potentially surgical interventions. However, despite this understanding, I find myself lacking the inner strength and conviction to make the decision to transition of my own accord.
As indicated earlier, my hesitations and fears of transitioning are largely intertwined with the concern for my marriage, as I fear that fully embracing my true self through transitioning might jeopardize the relationship with my spouse, whom I love deeply.
I don’t know what I expected from medical staff when I received my diagnosis, but I had to call my GP and struggle to get an appointment and request a GAHT consultation just to ask some questions around medical transition. I ended up pulling out during my second appointment for a variety of reasons, chief among them, was that it very much felt like it was my choice to start on hormones, if I want to. I didn’t chose any of this, nor do I want to "choose" to prescribe myself hormones knowing it can really mess things up for me.
I, like most people, respect and carry out medical directives given by medical professionals. And since they had established persistent dysphoria and they had my psychologist report, since they knew how easy I find it to discount my feelings, and surpress, I really feel it would have been more appropriate for them to firmly prescribe me with the most effective known treatment, GAHT, akin to how they have prescribed literally any other prescription for every other ailment I have had, and of course it would be a personal (though not recommended) choice NOT to take the hormones, as it is with any treatment. Rather than frame it as an option I could "chose".
But IANAD, and so I struggle with the prospect of actively “choosing” a treatment that may have significant consequences for my personal life. And as a result, I walked.
I’m at a loss with all this. I’ve been contemplating the role of mindfulness training and self-acceptance in alleviating gender dysphoria. One of the gender affirming care avenues outlined in my psych report suggests that mindfulness training can help disregard negative thoughts and promote self-acceptance. But I’m curious about the actual evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness training in managing gender dysphoria. Are there any studies or research that demonstrate its impact on alleviating gender dysphoria or promoting well-being in individuals who choose not to transition medically?
I consider myself to be of average intelligence, and problem solving ability, and thus most of my thinking needs some degree of contemplating, validating and meditation. I find it challenging to comprehend how mindfulness and self-acceptance alone, without transitioning, can sufficiently address the distress and disconnect associated with gender dysphoria, assuming my experience is fairly typical.
For me, I can’t even reliably identify what thoughts are negative anymore, take my thoughts around the relief I had after sex for example - they seemed hopeful, and therefore positive - a lead to follow, but now I’m learning that they’re misguided and destructive.
I’m here for exploring alternative strategies that would both preserve my marriage and allow me to grow in self acceptance, but I’ve arrived at the same realization from multiple angles that there is just no substitute to taking real steps to align oneself with ones gender – in my experience its appears to be predetermined, or at least, not driven by choice or logic.
I’m interested in hearing insights anecdotal or otherwise, of evidence of individuals successfully utilizing mindfulness training or self-acceptance as an alternative to transitioning.

Hecarim is a champ i just cant deal with if they're not really far behind or i'm far ahead. Even early he can just run at me as jungle with ghost and whatever, and when he gets youmuu's, i'll see him for one second before i just get one shot. With purple, even if i do manage to root him, i find if i am even in range to be able to root him, i'm not surviving anyway. Is there anything i can do or is just more team reliant than other champs.

35 AMAB, married, with two beautiful daughters, and about a year ago I discovered I was at odds with my gender assigned at birth and have been subsequently diagnosed with gender dysphoria after exploring my concerns in depth with my psychologist.
This past year I have explored various methods to alleviate gender dysphoria, including mindfulness training, positive affirmations, and self-acceptance courses. Despite my best efforts, I have come to the realization that these methods, including attempting to “think” my way out of my gender dysphoria, have not been serving me well.
One aspect that has been particularly challenging is the disconnection I have from my body. I struggle to fully connect with it and find respect or liking for it. I don't necessarily despise my body, I would just much prefer to have a female body. (Dysphoria for me is a sadness, a sustained sense of hopelessness reminding me I can't have the body I long for). I do however experience euphoria when I wear dresses, makeup etc. That may seem reasonably inert detail, but the fact dysphoria hasn’t manifested in outright hatred towards my body that you so often hear is the case, really compounds to the confusion around justifying the pursuit of hormone therapy, as you'll soon read.
I have experienced a loss of libido and difficulties with sexual satisfaction since discovering I had gender incongruity issues. I found temporary relief from all dysphoria after climaxing, sometimes lasting hours, and this lead me to convince myself that there were perhaps alternative motivations at play or at least hope of alternative ways to disprove or overcome dysphoria. However, after a lot of internalizing and journaling, it occurred to me that it’s actually more likely that the medical professionals are correct in their diagnosis. And my gender, and feelings towards, is probably completely beyond my control. And importantly, that these moments of relief are fleeting, meaningless, and arguably counterproductive as they result in false narratives, so I'm now learning to challenge the thoughts associated with experiencing sudden relief. That flip has been a big step for me, considering I used to spend my mental energy to challenge the dysphoric and euphoric feelings.
Until recently, I've viewed medical transition as being in direct competition with my values. I've really struggled with the notion that my "selfish wants / desires", are somehow getting the better of me, causing me to constantly think about about transitioning.
But I'm finding that I keep arriving at the same conclusion: I am a woman. I am a woman despite my doubts. I am a woman despite my fears. I can't change it. I can't control it, nor can my ambitions, my past achievements, my family. I simply am. I'm not broken. It's not going to "go away". It's not going to change. I might have reached out to the medical staff first, but I'm the last to the party. I need to learn to accept it. Embrace it. And this realization has provided me with a profound sense of clarity amidst the confusion and doubts, as it seems to provide an elegant answer to all of the seemingly irrational and selfish prospects transitioning has, in a way that suppression and ignoring couldn't ever do.
However this newfound clarity has also made me acutely aware of it’s implications. Though it pains me to say (there are some major potential relationship implications here), I have to face the very real possibility that the only viable way forward to live authentically is through medical transitioning, encompassing hormone therapy and potentially surgical interventions. However, despite this understanding, I find myself lacking the inner strength and conviction to make the decision to transition of my own accord.
As indicated earlier, my hesitations and fears of transitioning are largely intertwined with the concern for my marriage, as I fear that fully embracing my true self through transitioning might jeopardize the relationship with my spouse, whom I love deeply.
I don’t know what I expected from medical staff when I received my diagnosis, but I had to call my GP and struggle to get an appointment and request a GAHT consultation just to ask some questions around medical transition. I ended up pulling out during my second appointment for a variety of reasons, chief among them, was that it very much felt like it was my choice to start on hormones, if I want to. I didn’t chose any of this, nor do I want to "choose" to prescribe myself hormones knowing it can really mess things up for me.
I, like most people, respect and carry out medical directives given by medical professionals. And since they had established persistent dysphoria and they had my psychologist report, since they knew how easy I find it to discount my feelings, and surpress, I really feel it would have been more appropriate for them to firmly prescribe me with the most effective known treatment, GAHT, akin to how they have prescribed literally any other prescription for every other ailment I have had, and of course it would be a personal (though not recommended) choice NOT to take the hormones, as it is with any treatment. Rather than frame it as an option I could "chose".
But IANAD, and so I struggle with the prospect of actively “choosing” a treatment that may have significant consequences for my personal life. And as a result, I walked.
I’m at a loss with all this. I’ve been contemplating the role of mindfulness training and self-acceptance in alleviating gender dysphoria. One of the gender affirming care avenues outlined in my psych report suggests that mindfulness training can help disregard negative thoughts and promote self-acceptance. But I’m curious about the actual evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness training in managing gender dysphoria. Are there any studies or research that demonstrate its impact on alleviating gender dysphoria or promoting well-being in individuals who choose not to transition medically?
I consider myself to be of average intelligence, and problem solving ability, and thus most of my thinking needs some degree of contemplating, validating and meditation. I find it challenging to comprehend how mindfulness and self-acceptance alone, without transitioning, can sufficiently address the distress and disconnect associated with gender dysphoria, assuming my experience is fairly typical.
For me, I can’t even reliably identify what thoughts are negative anymore, take my thoughts around the relief I had after sex for example - they seemed hopeful, and therefore positive - a lead to follow, but now I’m learning that they’re misguided and destructive.
I’m here for exploring alternative strategies that would both preserve my marriage and allow me to grow in self acceptance, but I’ve arrived at the same realization from multiple angles that there is just no substitute to taking real steps to align oneself with ones gender – in my experience its appears to be predetermined, or at least, not driven by choice or logic.
I’m interested in hearing insights anecdotal or otherwise, of evidence of individuals successfully utilizing mindfulness training or self-acceptance as an alternative to transitioning.

Men are the provider is being wrongly misinterpreted, as to men are our personal 🐷 bank!
It’s insane how a lot of women (esp younger generation) are so hooked on men being the provider. Which I’m okay with. BUT they are taking it way out of context. That doesn’t mean the man PAYS for 100% of everything and you just sit on your stack up all your money.
There’s also a thing called (helpmate), which is your role in a traditional relationship. It’s crazy how a lot of women are only picking traditional values/qualities that benefit them. But when it’s time to doing your part… you scream “that’s struggle love”.
Stop misinterpreting what struggle love means. There’s nothing wrong with helping your man out. I’m not saying it HAVE to be 50:50. But it’s a minority of relationships/households, where the man pays for 💯 of EVERYTHING in today’s society (not excluding trips/hainails/trips/shopping). I’m not saying there’s not men who are able/currently doing that. But it’s definitely not the majority or even near 50% of men. Especially when you factor in kids!
Before you come in here and misconstrue what I’m trying to convey. I’m not saying you should be with a man who doesn’t have his stuff in order (roof over his head, car, stabled income, decent credit, and etc). That’s NOT what I’m advocating. But 🛑 saying there’s no good men out here. It’s not that there’s no good men, we just don’t want to get f*** financially by our woman. We already getting f**** by Uncle Sam, our jobs, and life.
I’m all for treating a woman out, massages, good food, gifts, trips together, spontaneous activities and etc. But damn… we not the federal reserve. We can’t just print money out of thin air.
I understand back in the day it was more feasible for the man to provide everything. But times are WAY different today, there’s a thing called COST OF LIVING/INFLATION. It’s not that men don’t want to provide and are just losers. The market is NOT the same anymore.
The chances of majority women finding a high earning man ($6 figures or more) is impossible. Cause there’s a small % of men who even make that much. That’s not even factoring in if they are already married/compatibility/etc.
Why would you want to overburden a man with such financial responsibilities, especially when you are already working as well. If a man is paying the rent/or mortgage, utilities, miscellaneous stuff… the least you can do is pull your weight as well. That alone is more than 70% of your living expenses (we haven’t even factored in daycare/other childcare expenses). What’s wrong with you buying food, paying your car note (most likely had that car loan prior to even meeting him), phone, and your personal self care (you should be doing that regardless if you’re in a relationship). If your man does extra outside of that, that’s a bonus. But it shouldn’t be a monthly obligation.
Please 🛑.
*Before you comment that us men need to stop looking for these type of women. These type of women are EVERYWHERE (If you aren’t one of these type of women this post isn’t for you). It’s not just women who still live with their parents. It’s single women, single moms, blue collar, white collar, and etc. They’re everywhere 😂. It’s a damn epidemic 😆.

35 AMAB, married, with two beautiful daughters, and about a year ago I discovered I was at odds with my gender assigned at birth and have been subsequently diagnosed with gender dysphoria after exploring my concerns in depth with my psychologist.
This past year I have explored various methods to alleviate gender dysphoria, including mindfulness training, positive affirmations, and self-acceptance courses. Despite my best efforts, I have come to the realization that these methods, including attempting to “think” my way out of my gender dysphoria, have not been serving me well.
One aspect that has been particularly challenging is the disconnection I have from my body. I struggle to fully connect with it and find respect or liking for it. I don't necessarily despise my body, I would just much prefer to have a female body. (Dysphoria for me is a sadness, a sustained sense of hopelessness reminding me I can't have the body I long for). I do however experience euphoria when I wear dresses, makeup etc. That may seem reasonably inert detail, but the fact dysphoria hasn’t manifested in outright hatred towards my body that you so often hear is the case, really compounds to the confusion around justifying the pursuit of hormone therapy, as you'll soon read.
I have experienced a loss of libido and difficulties with sexual satisfaction since discovering I had gender incongruity issues. I found temporary relief from all dysphoria after climaxing, sometimes lasting hours, and this lead me to convince myself that there were perhaps alternative motivations at play or at least hope of alternative ways to disprove or overcome dysphoria. However, after a lot of internalizing and journaling, it occurred to me that it’s actually more likely that the medical professionals are correct in their diagnosis. And my gender, and feelings towards, is probably completely beyond my control. And importantly, that these moments of relief are fleeting, meaningless, and arguably counterproductive as they result in false narratives, so I'm now learning to challenge the thoughts associated with experiencing sudden relief. That flip has been a big step for me, considering I used to spend my mental energy to challenge the dysphoric and euphoric feelings.
Until recently, I've viewed medical transition as being in direct competition with my values. I've really struggled with the notion that my "selfish wants / desires", are somehow getting the better of me, causing me to constantly think about about transitioning.
But I'm finding that I keep arriving at the same conclusion: I am a woman. I am a woman despite my doubts. I am a woman despite my fears. I can't change it. I can't control it, nor can my ambitions, my past achievements, my family. I simply am. I'm not broken. It's not going to "go away". It's not going to change. I might have reached out to the medical staff first, but I'm the last to the party. I need to learn to accept it. Embrace it. And this realization has provided me with a profound sense of clarity amidst the confusion and doubts, as it seems to provide an elegant answer to all of the seemingly irrational and selfish prospects transitioning has, in a way that suppression and ignoring couldn't ever do.
However this newfound clarity has also made me acutely aware of it’s implications. Though it pains me to say (there are some major potential relationship implications here), I have to face the very real possibility that the only viable way forward to live authentically is through medical transitioning, encompassing hormone therapy and potentially surgical interventions. However, despite this understanding, I find myself lacking the inner strength and conviction to make the decision to transition of my own accord.
As indicated earlier, my hesitations and fears of transitioning are largely intertwined with the concern for my marriage, as I fear that fully embracing my true self through transitioning might jeopardize the relationship with my spouse, whom I love deeply.
I don’t know what I expected from medical staff when I received my diagnosis, but I had to call my GP and struggle to get an appointment and request a GAHT consultation just to ask some questions around medical transition. I ended up pulling out during my second appointment for a variety of reasons, chief among them, was that it very much felt like it was my choice to start on hormones, if I want to. I didn’t chose any of this, nor do I want to "choose" to prescribe myself hormones knowing it can really mess things up for me.
I, like most people, respect and carry out medical directives given by medical professionals. And since they had established persistent dysphoria and they had my psychologist report, since they knew how easy I find it to discount my feelings, and surpress, I really feel it would have been more appropriate for them to firmly prescribe me with the most effective known treatment, GAHT, akin to how they have prescribed literally any other prescription for every other ailment I have had, and of course it would be a personal (though not recommended) choice NOT to take the hormones, as it is with any treatment. Rather than frame it as an option I could "chose".
But IANAD, and so I struggle with the prospect of actively “choosing” a treatment that may have significant consequences for my personal life. And as a result, I walked.
I’m at a loss with all this. I’ve been contemplating the role of mindfulness training and self-acceptance in alleviating gender dysphoria. One of the gender affirming care avenues outlined in my psych report suggests that mindfulness training can help disregard negative thoughts and promote self-acceptance. But I’m curious about the actual evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness training in managing gender dysphoria. Are there any studies or research that demonstrate its impact on alleviating gender dysphoria or promoting well-being in individuals who choose not to transition medically?
I consider myself to be of average intelligence, and problem solving ability, and thus most of my thinking needs some degree of contemplating, validating and meditation. I find it challenging to comprehend how mindfulness and self-acceptance alone, without transitioning, can sufficiently address the distress and disconnect associated with gender dysphoria, assuming my experience is fairly typical.
For me, I can’t even reliably identify what thoughts are negative anymore, take my thoughts around the relief I had after sex for example - they seemed hopeful, and therefore positive - a lead to follow, but now I’m learning that they’re misguided and destructive.
I’m here for exploring alternative strategies that would both preserve my marriage and allow me to grow in self acceptance, but I’ve arrived at the same realization from multiple angles that there is just no substitute to taking real steps to align oneself with ones gender – in my experience its appears to be predetermined, or at least, not driven by choice or logic.
I’m interested in hearing insights anecdotal or otherwise, of evidence of individuals successfully utilizing mindfulness training or self-acceptance as an alternative to transitioning.

Daniel Micay, the founder and long-time lead developer of GrapheneOS, has recently stepped down from the position of lead developer and will also be stepping down as a director of the GrapheneOS foundation. These announcements coincided with a video made by Louis Rossman where he suggested he would be leaving GrapheneOS due to Daniel Micay's communication issues.
There are important takeaways that a lot of people are missing and some very damaging and outright manipulative 'privacy advice' that stemming from this situation that needs to be called out. So here we go.

Daniel Micay stepping down is a good thing

I think this is very positive news both for Micay and the GrapheneOS project. Daniel Micay's security expertise and mobile engineering skills have been unmatched. In this regard, he is truly a world-class expert that was able to deliver the most secure operating system in the world and build up a team of talented developers that followed his vision. He did this from scratch, without the help from big investors or even big salaries. GrapheneOS has been funded by voluntary donations and it is that much more amazing that it became such a polished and easy-to-use product.
GrapheneOS today is full team of security experts and developers working to enhance privacy and security of everyone at zero cost to the end user. GrapheneOS is now a properly institutionalized entity. Having incorporated as a non-profit foundation, it's now broadly recognized not just in the infosec and privacy communities, but also in the broader technology sphere. It has received an endless amount of publicity and media attention and will be receiving even more in the future. This will be good both for talent acquisition and future fundraising campaigns. Daniel Micay deserves praise for his achievements in this regard and I will be grateful for delivering us the most important privacy project of my lifetime.
That being said, Daniel has been struggling with public communication and often ended up in up stirred up drama much of which probably could have been avoided if it was handled by a professional PR team, instead of Micay. There has been countless of examples of this and while it did highlight the negative aspects of toxicity in privacy communities, it also didn't serve to portray Micay as the best communicator either. I think it is positive news both for Micay and the GrapheneOS project that he is stepping down and will no longer play a role in public relations of the project. I hope Micay will find the recovery he is looking for and I wish the GrapheneOS project all the success it 100% deserves.

The Rossmann drama and why you should still use GrapheneOS

Louis Rossmann, a popular YouTube and a vocal advocate for the right to repair, has made several videos praising and recommending GrapheneOS. In his most recent video, however, Daniel Micay is seen pressuring Rossmann into deleting a comment he left underneath one of Techlore's videos on Daniel Micay and the GrapheneOS community. In no honest interpretation can someone argue that Rossmann would want to bully or harass Micay, yet that was Micay's insinuation in his pressure on Rossman. Many have jumped to making conclusions on Micay's mental health and the validity of the GrapheneOS project as a whole and this is where I think Rossmann overstepped in his logic. In Rossmann's conclusion, he lost trust in GrapheneOS if it is run by Micay because of his behavior. I understand why someone would make that assumption on the emotional level but it is completely illogical and removed from what's possible in reality.
GrapheneOS or anyone working on the project, cannot hijack your installation. They don't have access to the kind of data they'd need in order to discern individual users. GrapheneOS doesn't collect device identifiers, IMSI numbers or phone numbers. GrapheneOS doesn't require any user account like you'd need with the stock Android or the iPhone/iOS. The only relevant information collected by GrapheneOS is the IP address, which can be easily obfuscated with a VPN or Tor, both of which work 100% and have no issues connecting to GrapheneOS servers. GrapheneOS purges all IP logs within 10 days. The only other data point is the device model, .e.g. "Pixel 6". But that isn't narrow enough to discern individual users. In other words, GrapheneOS would never know who you are as a user of the system.
I am saying this, because a lot of people for so many years have tried to try to discredit GrapheneOS both as a project and as a product because of issues they have with Micay or other personalities. This is a completely illogical and asinine assumption. It has been made by Techlore, Rossmann and many others I find it very harmful to suggest objectively inferior privacy solutions because of personal feuds.
I get it that drama sucks. But let's keep our privacy recommendations based on merit rather our emotions and personal perceptions. GrapheneOS is objectively the most private and secure option out there. There really isn't any other operating system that comes close. Not CalyxOS, not LineageOS, not stock Android nor iOS. I have made a video on GrapheneOS security and I interviewed one of their developers. But if you want to hear it from a source I have 0 connections to, check out this comparision between GrapheneOS and CalyxOS. Whatever you think of Micay or anyone involved has zero value on the technical merit of GrapheneOS.

TL;DR

GrapheneOS is a world-class team of security experts and developers who working for the non-profit to develop the most secure operating system in the world. Despite personal and emotional issues with some individuals, it is by every merit the most trusted, private and secure system and it is the only one that should be recommended for privacy conscious users. No amount of drama can change this reality. Only merit can.

I'm a bleeding heart romantic A little too intense When I'm feeling frantic Thoughts can make no sense
What will you find Given enough time Under paper skin How soon till I begin To wear you down, my heart Never listened from the start Searching for its own kind Making up its mind, I'm Left to question why It's you, I can't deny When I wished that I was dead Well, I wanted you instead Cannot forget what you said Words that live inside my head
A spectre of, a lost love Part of me so deep Awakened as I came undone Now these feelings won't retreat Have I become, the monster and the beast Succumb to numb, admit defeat Turn off this bloody chunk of meat
Been writing as a hobby for years, mostly when stuck in my head or feeling extreme. Recently had good experiences with sharing more so I'm hoping someone finds some value in this. I have tons of these saved and want to do something with them. If you got this far, you are awesome and have a great day!
Edit: Mobile formatting

Source: IIHF.
You won't understand this post unless you understand how the IIHF World Rankings work. Perhaps later today or this week I'll put out a post on how the rankings work, so that I can keep linking back to it rather than having to explain it every year.
Also, Another post about the Women's World Ranking will be put out after their last tournament - Division 1A - is completed in August. Women's Olympic qualification starting points are decided at the end of next year.
The 2023 Men's IIHF season is now over! We now know the official rankings of each team.
Point Values:

Tournament	2022 Ranking Value	2023 Ranking Value
2023 Worlds		100%
2022 Worlds	100%	75%
2022 Olympics	100%	75%
2021 Worlds	75%	50%
2020 Worlds	50%	25%
2019 Worlds	25%

For the cancelled 2020 tournament, points were given based on seed. For 2021, where every division except the top level was cancelled, points were given based on Pre-Championship Report ranking.
Below is the table that includes each team's ranking from this year as well as last year, and the points earned in each individual year.
I've also included a column for Olympic seed, to see who starts where for Olympic qualifying.

• Olympic seeds given here assume that every country who is eligible to participate, does.
  • Where a country chooses not to participate or where they cannot participate, everyone ranked below them moves up.

Final 2023 IIHF Men's World Rankings:
Final 2023 IIHF Men's World Rankings, top 37 countries
Final 2023 IIHF Men's World Rankings, countries 38-58
Notes:

• This year, there was a slight change: The gold medallist now gets 1600 points instead of 1200, with all gaps between each placement remaining the same (1560 for silver etc). This is to allow for new teams to join at the bottom.
• As in previous years, Russia and Belarus were given points based on their ranks in the Pre-Championship Report.
• I cannot yet prove this, but Georgia appears to have been disqualified from Division 2A (if I had to guess, likely due to the use of ineligible players). This, along with North Korea's withdrawal from Division 3A, gives both countries 0 points for this year. Both are also relegated.

And with these rankings, we now see who starts where for Olympic qualifying!
In this post, I'm only going to include the final round of qualification as well as the main Olympic tournament.

• In this section, numbers in parentheses given are Olympic seeds, NOT World Ranking.
• This assumes the IOC upholds the bans of Russia and Belarus.

Projected Final Round of Men's Olympic Qualification: Each group is hosted by the top seed.

Group D:	Group E:	Group F:
(9) Latvia	(10) Denmark	(11) Norway
(14) Austria	(13) Kazakhstan	(12) France
(15) Slovenia	(16) Hungary	(17) Great Britain
Qualifier 6	Qualifier 5	Qualifier 4

Qualifiers 4-6 are determined by the teams who finish first in their respective groups in the Third Round of Qualification.
The winners of these three groups will advance as Qualifier 1, Qualifier 2 and Qualifier 3, in the order that they are ranked in the World Ranking (i.e. the highest advancing seed would be Qualifier 1, while the lowest is Qualifier 3). These three teams advance to the...
Men's Olympic Tournament 2026 (Projected Groups):

Group A:	Group B:	Group C:
(1) Canada	(2) Finland	(3) USA
(6) Switzerland	(5) Sweden	(4) Germany
(7) Czechia	(8) Slovakia	Wild Card 1
Wild Card 4	Wild Card 3	Wild Card 2

... where Wild Cards 1-4 are Qualifier 1, Qualifier 2, Qualifier 3 and host Italy, in the order that they are ranked in the World Ranking (written this way just in case someone ranked below Italy ends up qualifying).

Hello everyone, my name is David - (here are some pictures of me) and I'm a 27-year-old computer science graduate from New Jersey. I'm here on reddit in the hopes of finding a like-minded woman who is interested in a great long-term relationship.
In my free time, I enjoy exploring the great outdoors through camping, going to Renaissance fairs and museums, skateboarding, taking walks on the beach, and trying new restaurants. I'm a big fan of gaming, both on my PC and Switch, and listening to Extreme Metal music, especially Black Metal, Death Metal, Brutal Death Metal, and Slam. I'm also slowly learning Japanese, not just for anime, but also for music and to have fun playing games in the original language (I've been going kinda slow but I have a long duolingo streak). Some of my favorite bands include: Cradle of Filth, Belphegor, Gorgoroth, Mayhem, Emperor, Imperial Circus Dead Decadence, Unlucky Morpheus, King Diamond, The Black Dahlia Murder, and Burzum.
In my search for a partner, I'm looking for someone who has a great sense of humor, strong family values, and a positive outlook on life. I prefer women between the ages of 18-24 who are East-Asian, South-East-Asian, or Caucasian, and who are slim, fit, or petite. While education and job aren't crucial to me, I'm not interested in someone who has had a lot of sexual partners. My main priority is finding someone who is interested in a serious relationship and starting a family someday.
If this sounds like you, I'd love to get to know you better. Don't hesitate to send me a message and let's see where things go! I'd love to get a photo as well.

Currently, NWBO's Sawston plant is the only visible global hub for DC VAX L manufacturing and distribution (MHRA MIA approval 3/20/23) . For $400 , FED EX (https://www.fedex.com/en-us/custom-critical.html) ships anywhere globally within the required timeframes.A SAGE (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20363613231179541) 5/26/23 scientific publication demonstrates intent by Pakistani neurosurgeons to treat and cure their GBM patients. Looks like the DC VAX L JAMA paper and LIAU- Bosch presentations since 10/26/22 have created global awareness that DCVAX L will be is a major global cell based biotech therapy, addressing GBM , and all solid tumors( https://conferences.asco.org/am/industry-expert-theater).
With 50% of LIAU-SPORE-UCLA combo patents living 10 years, DC VAX L has turned SOC's GBM treatment from a terminal (16.5) months disease into a chronic treatable malignancy .
Dr. Greg Zivic:
"This treatment can turn a Glioblastoma into a chronic treatable disease even after recurrence of the tumor . "
https://nwbio.com/northwest-biotherapeutics-and-advent-bioservices-announce-receipt-of-license-for-commercial-manufacturing-at-sawston-u-k-facility/
https://twitter.com/AllenTurner206/status/1636426400382205952
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171479167
Monday, May 29, 2023 9:13:34 AM
Post# 596739 of 596755 4 Pakistani neurosurgeons endorsing the JAMA Liau dc vax l phase 3 study. Will the RA in Pakistan facilitate their patients' resected GBM tumors and lysate being sent to Sawston , with syringes of dc vax l sent back to Pakistan?
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20363613231179541
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36591625/
IMO,BB's consultant is a "legend ", as alleged.Therefore, I recommend reading every on of his posts, word for word.
Bright Boy Brian F Egolf Sr M: Bright Boy
Re: ae kusterer post# 593171
Sunday, May 14, 2023 2:22:21 PM
Post# 593185 of 593185 I am definitely not a biotech expert and what I've learned about Northwest and DCVax-l was shared with me by one of the legends in the biotech world !!! My biggest takeaway is this:
From 2018 forward, it became apparent that DCVax-L was a breakthrough, technological process for the treatment of nGBM and rGBM, but its true potential was only known by a "handful" of experts, and as such, the understanding of the broader market implications was a relative unknown. Early on, several of the comments that I heard from BP were," The GBM market is really not that big!" and " Personalized, Immunotherapy vaccines are not really in our 'Wheelhouse'. We sell compounds/pills!!" On and on! The comments didn't mean that BP wasn't paying attention! Quite the contrary, BP was watching like a hawk as results from Dr. Liau and the UCLA trials began to leak into the medical community suggesting a broader application of DCVax-L on a "stand alone" basis and in combination with CI's for all large tumor cancers ( mentioned in the latest 10Q for future trials), thus dramatically expanding market potentials!!! But the "Big Moment" occurred in late October of last year when the STADIUM LIGHTS turned on, shining bright lights on the latest nGBM/rGBM ,Dr. Liau trial data suggesting 50%to 65% OS for 8 years with emphasis on rGBM !!! That was the point in time when BP and the entire biotech world realized that GBM/rGBM would be treated and managed as a CHRONIC DISEASE!!! with unlimited PROMISE and HOPE for patients and unlimited marketing potential to finance existing vaccine production and the continuing development for improved treatments for all diseases!!!!!
So that's what I learned and that's my story and I'm stickin to it!!!!
Cheers especially to all the Mom's and to everyone !!!
BB
Joseph H.Pratt: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172010930
Bright Boy Re: None Saturday, March 18, 2023 12:38:55 PM Post# of 596750 Go People, People, People !!!!
The light switch just turned on for me !!! I'm not a doctor or scientist or a STEM concentration "rock star", but if I read something over and over again several times and look carefully at the pictures SOMETIMES, NOT ALL THE TIME, a major mental breakthrough occurs and I believe that I've discovered something very profound!!
In this case, I believe the main message from the slide deck is that DCVax-L, either by itself or in combination with CI's has turned the whole thing around for treating nGBM/rGBM from having to kill the tumor to a "management process" !! It looks like now with this new information, that GBM patients can receive vaccinations as needed with "Zero" side effects and live a long and happy life !!! A comment from a medical expert that DOES KNOW !!!:
Dr. Greg Zivic:
This treatment can turn a Glioblastoma into a chronic treatable disease even after recurrence of the tumor.
So help me out here. Does the above reasoning seem logical based on the slides all of us have just reviewed?? If it does or is, then little Team Northwest has just changed the healthcare landscape forever in the way that we treat disease!!!!!
Am I way off base or are all of onto to something that is fabulous beyond belief???
Cheers,
BB
Bright Boy Re: thermopost# 591947 Tuesday, May 09, 2023 8:41:30 PM Post# of 596749 Go The UK is determined to be the world carrousel for use of immunotherapy vaccines to treat cancers and all forms of disease!!! From my friends in the UK, my use of the word "determined" grossly understates the effort behind the "Grand Plan"!!
So far, the MHRA has not only accepted and approved the MIA application (manufacturing license), but voluntarily offered the expansion to a GLOBAL MANUFACTURING" license allowing for the import of live cells and the export of vaccines to the far corners of the earth!!! People!!! That is huge!!!!! BUT as always 99.99% of the retail investors don't understand the significance of that license or anything else about the process and look to the screen to validate the importance/value of the license, where they are greeted by Citadel and Virtu and the rest of the gang that manipulate the price to new lows, confirming that, in spite of everything they just read from the greatest medical minds in the universe, is a bunch of crap!!!!
Fortunately for the cancer patients and shareholders of Northwest, the MHRA does not include in their decision making process the current SP of NWBO or the opinion of the "gutter filth" that manage those companies or any other companies that participate in the ordered destruction of small biotechs that are engaged in the development of immunotherapy vaccines!! So, it's on to the filing of the MAA (marketing license), the approval and the decisions that will guarantee swift treatment deliveries to patients!!
So Griffin and Cifu and Fuerstein and the rest can lie all they want , but the GREAT UNITED KINGDOM will not be denied the ultimate crown of being the WORLD CENTER for CANCER TREATMENT !!!!!
Cheers,
BB
Bright Boy Re: hoffmann6383post# 578889 Tuesday, March 21, 2023 1:55:12 PM Post# of 596749 Go People, People, People!!! It's your friendly "hillbilly" here with some more great news!! Don't know if I can "one up" my earlier post about the "Dog eating the license", but I'll try. So here we go!!
I don't think everyone realizes how dynamic and important the manufacturing license really is so I'll take a shot at giving you my take on it. First of all, the marketing approval (MAA) and the government subsidy approval(NICE) are pretty much in the bag before the manufacturing team gets the "green light" to proceed. The MAA and NICE teams talk to the MIA team and say," This stuff looks really cool and we wanted to let you know before you run off and do a lot of work on something that we won't approve when you're finished!!" Okay! So that's the first part.
Now for the second part and this is the part that involves a lot of money so read very carefully!!! The MIA license allows for global export of the vaccines and global import of immune cells/tumor resected material. Anyone in the entire world that is diagnosed with GBM can NOW ship their tumor samples to Northwest/Advent/Sawston to have their personal vaccine made and stored, all to be shipped back to the patient/doctor on a prescribed injection schedule. The beauty of this process is that patients everywhere can NOW receive their vaccine on a compassionate care basis. No more waiting!! No more opportunities for the "dark forces" to delay or deny suffering cancer patients their desperately needed treatments !!!
People, as of yesterday, Northwest is now IN BUSINESS !!!! AND that opens the door for institutional investors and an uplist to the New York or Nasdaq exchanges!!!!
All of the above is as good as that first sip of ice cold buttermilk on a hot summer day!!!! AND for those unfortunate shorts and haters it adds a whole new description to the letters FTD and I'll let you guess what that might be!!!
Cheers,
BB
Bright Boy Re: None Tuesday, March 21, 2023 9:05:54 PM Post# of 596749 Go The MIA allows for "International Immune Cell Imports" and "International Vaccine Exports" !!! That is big news and a big, big market and should access every cancer patient in need!!!!
Cheers,
BB
ae kusterer
Re: None
Monday, May 29, 2023 9:13:34 AM
Post# 596739 of 596755 4 Pakistani neurosurgeons endorsing the JAMA Liau dc vax l phase 3 study. Will the RA in Pakistan facilitate their patients' resected GBM tumors and lysate being sent to Sawston , with syringes of dc vax l sent back to Pakistan?
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20363613231179541
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36591625/
Abstract Objective: To define the landscape of treatment patterns and current epidemiological data regarding gliomas in Pakistan.
Methods: As part of the Pakistan Brain Tumour Epidemiology Study (PBTES), data were collected from 32 neurosurgical centres across the country. Our retrospective study looked at patients who underwent surgical procedures for gliomas in 2019 in neurosurgical centres. The data was collated and analysed using STATA version 15.
Results: A total of 781 patients with gliomas were identified 479(61.8%) in public sector hospitals, 302(39.1%) in the private sector). The most common histopathological subtypes were glioblastoma 262 (33.5%), followed by astrocytoma 147(18.8%) and oligodendroglioma 93(11.9%). Gender distribution was skewed towards men 508(65%). Private institution hospitals performed surgical biopsies as the first surgical procedure 75(23%) more often than public hospitals 38(9%). Chemotherapy was given to 115(29.8%) patients, and there was no data regarding 467(53%) of patients. Similarly, only 202(43.9%) patients received radiation therapy, and there was no data for 469(60%) of patients. For high-grade gliomas specifically, only 95(31.8%) patients with HGG have a record of receiving radiation therapy, and only 57(18.9%) had a record of being started on chemotherapy.
DCvax: A promising advancement in oncology for the treatment of glioblastoma Areeba Fareed https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-9852 [email protected], Samia Rohail https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-0080, […], and Abdul Moiz Khan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9796-8867+1View all authors and affiliations All Articles https://doi.org/10.1177/20363613231179541
Contents Declaration of conflicting interests Funding ORCID iDs Footnotes References PDF / ePub More Dear Editor, Glioblastoma is a malignant neoplasm of the central nervous system that arises from glial cells, primarily astrocyctes and is characterized by poorly differentiated, fusiform, round or pleomorphic astrocyctic cells with marked nuclear atypical and brisk mitotic activity.1 Despite advances in early diagnosis and comprehensive treatments, there is nearly 100% recurrence rate and dismal patient survival.2 According to researchers, more than 13,000 Americans are diagnosed with Glioblastoma annually, causing significant morbidity and mortality. There has been no cure for Glioblastoma so far.3 Treatment options often include surgical removal of the tumor followed by concomitant radiation and adjuvant temozolomide TMZ chemotherapy which has been the standard of care for glioblastoma since decades, but exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation is a well-known exogenous risk factor for glioblastoma. The inability to cross the BBB is the major obstacle in achieving remission after surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiation.4 As a result, glioblastoma typically recurs within six to 8 months and the survival rate is generally less than 5%.2 Despite the development of novel, complex, multidisciplinary, and targeted therapies the outcome for patients remains almost universally lethal.5 Therefore, the need for effective treatment is undeniable. For this reason, it has been a priority area in cancer research. Recently, US biotech company Northwest Biotherapeutics has developed a brain cancer vaccine, called DCVax, which is designed to help patients' immune system to target their tumors that may prolong their life by months or, in some cases, years.5 Thus, opening a door for the development of innovative therapy for targeting glioblastoma. The vaccine is created for each patient individually by isolating dendritic cells, from their blood which is then primed with biomarkers from a sample of the patient’s tumor.6 Dendritic cells present tumor antigens to the immune system, prime T cells, and mobilize antitumor responses.6 To evaluate the safety of the vaccine and its impact on survival time in patients with Glioblastoma, a phase 3 randomized control trial was conducted.7 In this trial, 348 patients newly diagnosed with Glioblastoma were tested at King’s College Hospital and other centers around the world for 8 years.7 Patients had surgery to remove their tumors as much as possible, followed by radiation and chemotherapy as the standard treatment for Glioblastoma.7 Among these patients, two out of three were treated with the vaccine, DCVax-L, with the remaining one-third receiving a placebo.7 The astonishing result of the trial has shown that newly diagnosed patients who received the vaccine survived for 19.3 months compared to 16.5 months for those who received a placebo.8 Overall 13% of all trial participants treated with DCVax lived more than 5 years after diagnosis compared with 5.7% in the comparison group who did so.8 Moreover, this is the first time in 17 years that such a significant result has been achieved in a Phase 3 trial of a systemic treatment for newly diagnosed Glioblastoma, and it’s the first treatment in 27 years for patients with GBM recurrence.9 Thus, this development represents a major step forward in our efforts to combat this devastating disease. Based on the findings of the trials evaluating the drug’s efficacy, it has the potential to improve the quality of life for patients, especially for the elderly and those unable to have surgery. A global clinical trial has concluded that the DCVax is the world’s first vaccine to treat deadly cancerous brain tumors that could help patients to live for years.9 This breakthrough could benefit 2500 people a year in the UK being diagnosed with Glioblastoma.9 It has also been shown that this therapy can be used to treat cancers other than Glioblastoma.9 However, due to high recurrence rate and lethal outcomes, the treatment of gliblastoma has seen significant transformation, switching from an aggressive surgical strategy to a more cautious one. The endorsement of the vaccine is a commendable achievement, and it demonstrates the unwavering commitment of researchers and healthcare professionals to discovering effective treatments for such lethal disease. Furthermore, vaccine may enhance the quality of life of a patient and provides a new hope for patients and their families Thus, it is crucial that we continue to support research into Glioblastoma and the development of novel treatments so that we can envision a future where this disease is eradicated. Declaration of conflicting interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ORCID iDs Areeba Fareed https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-9852 Samia Rohail https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-0080 Alishba Adnan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-6687 Abdul Moiz Khan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9796-8867 Footnotes Author’s noteNot commissioned, externally peer reviewed. ContributorshipAreeba Fareed and Samia Rohail wrote the draft. Alishba Adnan and Abdul Moiz Khan proofread it. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data availabilityNo new dataset generated. References 1. Aans.org. Available from: https://www.aans.org/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Glioblastoma-Multiforme%5d (cited 9 April 2023). GO TO REFERENCE Google Scholar 2. Liau LM, Ashkan K, Brem S, et al. Association of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination with extension of survival among patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 3 prospective externally controlled cohort trial: a phase 3 prospective externally controlled cohort trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9(1): 112–121. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847 (cited 9 April 2023).
PubMed Google Scholar 3. Pelc C. Experimental cancer vaccine both treats and prevents brain cancer in mice [Internet]. East Sussex, UK: Medical News Today, 2023. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/experimental-cancer-vaccine-both-treats-and-prevents-brain-cancer-in-mice (cited 9 April 2023). GO TO REFERENCE Google Scholar 4. Rong L, Li N, Zhang Z. Emerging therapies for glioblastoma: current state and future directions. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2022; 41(1): 142. (cited 9 April 2023). GO TO REFERENCE Crossref PubMed Google Scholar 5. Aldape K, Brindle KM, Chesler L, et al. Challenges to curing primary brain tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16(8): 509–520. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-019-0177-5 (cited 9 April 2023).
Crossref PubMed Google Scholar 6. Technology Networks. Brain cancer vaccine shown to extend patient survival [Internet]. Sudbury, UK: Technology Networks, 2022. Available from: https://www.technologynetworks.com/vaccines/news/brain-cancer-vaccine-shown-to-extend-patient-survival-367721 (cited 9 April 2023).
Google Scholar 7. Clinicaltrials.gov. Study of a drug [DCVax®-L] to treat newly diagnosed GBM brain cancer - full text view - Clinicaltrials.gov [internet]. Bethesda, MD: Clinicaltrials.gov, 2023. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00045968 (cited 9 April 2023).
Google Scholar 8. Campbell D. Vaccine shown to prolong life of patients with aggressive brain cancer. London, UK: The guardian [Internet], 2022. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/nov/17/vaccine-shown-to-prolong-life-patients-aggressive-brain-cancer-trial-glioblastoma (cited 9 April 2023).
Google Scholar 9. Delgado-Martín B, Medina MÁ. Advances in the knowledge of the molecular biology of glioblastoma and its impact in patient diagnosis, stratification, and treatment. Adv Sci 2020; 7(9): 1902971.
Crossref Google Scholar📷 0 Share Reply/Post Keep Last Read More Next 10 Prev NextNWBONorthwest Biotherapeutics Inc (QB)0.615 0.011 (1.82%)Volume:1,013,957Day Range:0.6011 - 0.62Bid:0.61Ask:0.615Last Trade Time:3:59:10 PM EDTTotal Trades:378

• 1D
• 1M
• 3M
• 6M
• 1Y
• 5Y

📷

NWBO Detailed Quote

Recent NWBO News

• Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/05/2023 11:32:06 PM
• Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/05/2023 01:31:24 PM
• Nightfood, Inc. (OTCQB: NGTF) now in Sonesta International Hotels Multiple Brands • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 03/13/2023 11:35:55 AM
• Annual Report (10-k) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/28/2023 09:31:58 PM
• Annual Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (5) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/07/2023 10:55:54 PM
• Current Report Filing (8-k) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/13/2023 09:34:51 PM
• Current Report Filing (8-k) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/06/2023 09:42:13 PM
• Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials (definitive) (defa14a) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/23/2022 10:24:51 PM
• Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials (definitive) (defa14a) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/16/2022 06:40:40 PM
• Proxy Statement (definitive) (def 14a) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/05/2022 12:01:37 PM
• Northwest Bio Accuses Market Makers of Share Price Manipulation • TipRanks • 12/01/2022 03:29:04 PM
• Proxy Statement - Notice of Shareholders Meeting (preliminary) (pre 14a) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2022 10:30:31 PM
• Quarterly Report (10-q) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/09/2022 09:31:44 PM
• Acquisition Completed: Endexx (EDXC)'s HYLA Secures 200k+ Unit Order; 4,500 Puffs per Unit • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 09/27/2022 01:33:31 PM
• Amended Annual Report (10-k/a) • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/30/2022 09:09:33 PM

More NWBO News

InvestorsHub NewsWire
CGrowth Capital Consolidates Lithium Tenement Portfolio in Tanzania Amid Renewed Mining Confidence • CGRA • May 25, 2023 11:05 AM
Interactive Strength Inc. d/b/a FORME Launches European Expansion Plan by Focusing on Strategic Partnership with SIGNA Sports United • TRNR • May 24, 2023 10:14 AM
Nextech3D.ai Game-Changing Generative-AI CAD 3D Design Studio Toggle3D.ai Primed For $7 Million June IPO • NTAR • May 24, 2023 10:00 AM
Kaya Holdings, Inc.'s V.P. Bryan Arnold Among First Ten (10) State Licensed Psilocybin Facilitators in U.S.A. • KAYS • May 24, 2023 9:48 AM
ILUS Confirms Its First Quarter of 2023 Results • ILUS • May 23, 2023 9:34 AM
SKYX Set to Join Russell 2000® and Russell 3000® Indexes • SKYX • May 23, 2023 8:56 AM
Start posting your company's newsOnly $200 per official company press release!

https://swisschems.is/product/melanotan-ii-10mg-price-is-per-vial/ code CHEMSEX10
FOR RESEARCH USE ONLY
---
Are you tired of spending hours in the sun for that perfect tan, or do you struggle with skin that simply doesn't tan well? If so, you may be interested in the potential of Melanotan II, a research compound that's currently making waves in the tanning and research community. As always, the best place to find such innovative research compounds is Swiss Chems - a leading supplier known for its quality products.
What is Melanotan II?
Melanotan II is a synthetic analogue of the peptide hormone α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), which is produced in the body and is responsible for skin and hair pigmentation. As a research compound, Melanotan II has been studied for its potential to increase the production of melanin in the skin without exposure to sun, thereby possibly resulting in a darker and more tanned appearance.
Swiss Chems' Melanotan II
At Swiss Chems, we pride ourselves on sourcing and supplying the highest quality research products. Our Melanotan II comes in 10mg vials, allowing researchers to have precise control over the quantity used in their studies.
This peptide research compound has attracted attention from researchers worldwide, intrigued by its potential effects on skin pigmentation. Although research is ongoing and these effects are not fully understood or confirmed, Melanotan II continues to be a point of interest in the scientific community.
Why Choose Swiss Chems?
Quality, trust, and reliability – these are the pillars of our business. When you choose Swiss Chems, you are choosing a trusted supplier that values product quality and customer satisfaction above all else.
Our products undergo rigorous quality control processes to ensure that they meet and exceed industry standards. Customer reviews on our website stand testament to our dedication towards maintaining a high standard of service.
We're committed to supporting scientific discovery and research by providing access to potentially groundbreaking compounds like Melanotan II.
Conclusion
While Melanotan II is an exciting compound for research purposes, it's crucial to remember that it is NOT approved for human use. Always ensure that any research conducted is performed with the appropriate oversight and strictly adheres to all relevant ethical and safety guidelines.
If you're interested in learning more about Melanotan II or wish to incorporate it into your research project, head to Swiss Chems today and explore our product range. Join the community of researchers and scientists dedicated to pushing the boundaries of knowledge and discovery.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is intended for educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical or professional advice and is not intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, treatment, or prevention of any condition or disease. Always consult with a healthcare professional before starting any new treatment or altering your current regimen.

I'm on the fence about getting a battery powered mower and have been researching EGO mowers. Generally when purchasing something above several hundred dollars I like to try to get the latest release/model year of a device to ensure longer term support. EGO lists 10+ mowers on their Quick Compare matrix page here. Initially I was drawn to the LM2135SP by Wirecutter's recommendation but it seems like that model was released in 2019 or 2020 according to my Googling. Does that align with what you all are familiar with? Just trying to get a relative idea of the release dates of EGO mowers so that I can find the newest model in the middle of the range. Not looking to spend $800+ and was hoping to be closer to $500-700/middle range.